tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.comments2023-05-02T02:10:19.813-06:00A Pax Americana and other fun stuff ........Charleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02479997164145846530noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-50917070914601684512011-01-28T21:20:14.374-07:002011-01-28T21:20:14.374-07:00actually, he is doing just like Carter. helping t...actually, he is doing just like Carter. helping the islamists in the name of 'democracy' but being so wishy-washy that the street level people will hate us more than they did before we 'helped'Mike Mnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-15839768954393106872011-01-18T07:45:27.850-07:002011-01-18T07:45:27.850-07:00Thats a pretty impressive list you've compiled...Thats a pretty impressive list you've compiled Charles.<br />In the late 80's and 90's I used to think Michelle Pfeiffer and Meg Ryan looked enough alike to play sisters and Kurt Russell and Mel Gibson who you paired as look alikes have done a movie together,Tequila Sunrise although they played best friends rather than brothers.<br />Thanks for an enjoyable post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-80716330035412858742010-07-01T11:00:53.335-06:002010-07-01T11:00:53.335-06:00Under GW Bush, over 80 internment camps were built...Under GW Bush, over 80 internment camps were built by KBR<br />Under GW Bush, we very nearly lost our sovereignty and became the North American Union, erasing the borders between us, Mexico and Canada.<br />Under GW Bush, we very nearly passed legislation that would have required every citizen to be implanted with an RF ID chip. <br />We have numerous examples of GW Bush and his daddy glad-handing MANY of the world's 'enemies' and they are well known for their ties to oil and terrorism in the Middle East. <br /><br />Fascism isn't Barry's idea. I'm not a fan of our current president either, but they may be propelling that agenda more quickly and obviously through him, but they've been working on this since right after WWII. They started talking about Global Warming as a way to bring people 'in line' with their thinking in the very early 60s. Prescott Bush was a Nazi sympathizer and fan of fascism. His friends and cohorts are the families that are now calling the shots here because they can afford to create disasters in order to prove their god-like powers and to throw their weight around. Their time is coming... This republic is going to look a lot different in 10 years. The people won't stand for less than a revolution.E Boyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14883324201898072897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-42528900622223788212010-05-13T11:40:59.272-06:002010-05-13T11:40:59.272-06:00Thanks, Jim! I appreciate the feedback. I though...Thanks, Jim! I appreciate the feedback. I thought long and hard about the "piss" comment, but any other phrasing just didn't have the impact, it sounded too sugar coated. Then I remembered how many of the private letters of the founding fathers had a "pissing" reference, it seemed to be a common term for extreme disrespect, and decided to go for it. But I certainly understand the point! I'm gunna' reword the Puerto Rican comment to reflect better what I was thinking. Thanks again!Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02479997164145846530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-31141472469863028302010-05-11T15:09:21.103-06:002010-05-11T15:09:21.103-06:00You have a good product here that presents some un...You have a good product here that presents some unique ways of looking at the issue. But there is one misstatement that threatens the credibility of the document.<br /><br />In the paragraph where you exhort the legal immigrants to STAND UP, you included Puerto Ricans. Puerto Ricans are US citizens at birth. By saying that, you left your stance open to another misdirection.<br /><br />You also stated later, "... these people who piss upon everything..." I'm no prude, but that distracts from your argument.<br /><br />I do thank you for airing these views. You made some great points.<br /><br />Jim SwitzerJames Switzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14821988887795019122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-15340315056708231172010-04-08T17:21:43.652-06:002010-04-08T17:21:43.652-06:00Hi Charles,
Your blog has been recommended to us ...Hi Charles,<br /><br />Your blog has been recommended to us as a interviewee's favorite blog!<br /><br />We would like to do an interview with you about your blog for Blog<br />Interviewer. We'd<br />like to give you the opportunity to<br />give us some insight on the "person behind the blog."<br /><br />It would just take a few minutes of your time. The interview form can<br />be submitted online here <a href="http://bloginterviewer.com/submit-an-interview" rel="nofollow">Submit your<br />interview</a>.<br /><br />Best regards,<br /><br />Mike ThomasMichael Thomashttp://www.bloginterviewer.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-6846934257812990132009-10-02T12:26:37.255-06:002009-10-02T12:26:37.255-06:00how come there is always a new crisis that people ...how come there is always a new crisis that people want to worry about.<br /><a href="http://www.blogtoilet.com/2009/10/02/politics-can-be-wacky/" rel="nofollow">Two Voices</a> | <a href="http://www.blogtoilet.com/2009/10/02/politics-can-be-wacky/" rel="nofollow">Two Guys</a>brallinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-63955794842072062008-08-26T15:11:00.000-06:002008-08-26T15:11:00.000-06:00McCain is our only choice to save what we know as ...McCain is our only choice to save what we know as the United States of America. Obama can not be trusted. For all you Liberals leaving your URL's here is a very cool site that everyone needs to take a look at http://www.shoottheliberals.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-70013502585942696172008-02-07T07:30:00.000-07:002008-02-07T07:30:00.000-07:00I totally agree with you about Obama. How can any ...I totally agree with you about Obama. How can any true American vote for a man to be President of the U.S. if he won't honor our flag and what it represents? It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with his muslim background, but everything to do with honoring, and respecting, our country and what we as a nation, represent. Eyes need to be opened here to see truly what and who he(Obama) really is. Let's get pass this prejudiced issue or racist issue, and focus on whether he is a man of integrity and honor. Because if he isn't, and if he refuses to honor the U.S. of America, than he shouldn't even be in the Presidential election at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-83573712847733144172008-01-09T09:56:00.000-07:002008-01-09T09:56:00.000-07:00Americans want change in Washington, there's no do...Americans want change in Washington, there's no doubt about that. <BR/><BR/>But try as they will to convince voters that they're the candidate for change, it seems obvious to me that candidates who are already firmly entrenched Washington insiders are NOT the ones who will make those changes. <BR/><BR/>It's exactly that insider same old, same old "experience" so many of the candidates tout that most Americans want to get rid of. <BR/><BR/>WASHINGTON CANNOT FIX WASHINGTON! <BR/><BR/>Mitt Romney makes a telling comment: <BR/><BR/>“People who have been there all their careers don’t begin to have the freedom of movement and the capacity to change Washington. They’ve got lobbyists at every elbow, the deals have been worked out in the Senate cloakrooms are just so overwhelming – the scores that have to be settled, all of the favors that have to honored. You just can’t get the job done in Washington with people that have been in Washington all their lives. So people are saying you know what? We need change.” <BR/><BR/>To me it seems perfectly clear that the most qualified outsider candidate, the one who is most likely to make real change in Washington, is Mitt Romney. <BR/><BR/>Romney's MBA and Doctorate from Harvard, his proven record of success in making the right executive decisions time after time, and his lifetime devotion to the family values cherished by most Americans demonstrate clearly that he's the man for the Whitehouse. <BR/><BR/>I think it's time for Americans to unite behind that man - he's head and shoulders above ALL the other candidates.<BR/><BR/><BR/>http://justamere10.blogspot.comJustamere10https://www.blogger.com/profile/05199157573292012975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1170877803727139062007-02-07T12:50:00.000-07:002007-02-07T12:50:00.000-07:00I can't agree with you more...We're too dependent ...I can't agree with you more...<BR/><BR/>We're too dependent on technology and its speed...<BR/><BR/>---------------------------<BR/><A HREF="http://houseofpolitics.com" REL="nofollow">houseofpolitics.com</A>DonationTreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04942398281451906685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1155790330123538882006-08-16T22:52:00.000-06:002006-08-16T22:52:00.000-06:00The way to deal with illegal aliens here is the Un...The way to deal with illegal aliens here is the United States is to crack down on employers who hire them. It may temporarily affect the economy. However, hiring illegals leads to displacement of legal workers, degradation of wages and benefits, and deterioration of the middle class.<BR/><BR/>Governments at all levels should follow the example set by Hazelton, Pennsylvania.skymailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12337339578430513721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1098974963023219832004-10-28T08:49:00.000-06:002004-10-28T08:49:00.000-06:00No one thinks of the Nazi occupation of Poland, th...No one thinks of the Nazi occupation of Poland, the Warsaw Ghetto or Hitler anymore. Kerry/Edwards are not National Socialists, and to compare them to Hitler is an insult to Hitler. Kerry/Edwards are without question two of the most modern day Lenin Bolsheviks ever seen in America since FDR. Hiltler hated the Bolsheviks. In fact the National Socialist party despised the communists. So the proper metaphor for Kerry/Edwards is International Bolshevism. Until Americans wake up to the Judeo-Bolsheviks in the Democrap party and the Lamestream media, then nothing will stop the slow slide into the most dastardly ideology conceived by man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1097890826932848022004-10-15T19:40:00.000-06:002004-10-15T19:40:00.000-06:00I will never fail to amaze me the obvious two-face...I will never fail to amaze me the obvious two-faced double standard in our political system.... if the GOP were taking the actions that the DEMS are, we would be accused of trying to "stifle the vote"....... oh! Wiat! The GOP IS being accused of that, although it's the DEMS who are doing everything you stated above.... amazing.Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02479997164145846530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1097441820123857082004-10-10T14:57:00.000-06:002004-10-10T14:57:00.000-06:00Well, I have to agree but Kerry has little choice ...Well, I have to agree but Kerry has little choice but to offer a stark contrast in views with Bush. He would have no hope if he offered much of the same. I think this puts him in a disengenuous mode and, hopefully, the negativity turns many Americans off.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1097357750305287732004-10-09T15:35:00.000-06:002004-10-09T15:35:00.000-06:00Democratic Silence
Nearly four years ago, America...Democratic Silence<br /><br />Nearly four years ago, America experienced one of the most electrifying and controversial presidential races in our history. <br /><br />After a campaign full of last minute surprises, many accusations of voter disenfranchisement, accusations of poll discrimination, and court challenges by the Democratic Party, George Bush was sworn in as our nations President. Somehow, against all the odds, he was declared the election night winner. <br /><br />Four years later, Americans are now faced with another set of choices in an election that is looking more and more like a repeat of the year 2000 event. The campaigns of both parties, again, have been a unique testimony to our democracy and representative government. We see many twisting of truths on both sides, leaving many Americans confused and with only a handful of undecided; there are slim pickings to be had by either the Democrats or the Republicans. <br /><br />However, every American can agree it is healthy to debate issues and ideas. <br /><br />Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has already laid the groundwork for disputing any results that do not meet their expectations in key battle ground states. <br /><br />Thousands of lawyers have been dispatched around the country ready to take court action to dispute election results that they believe are wrong. This is all being done under the mantra of “Voter Disenfranchisement”, “Discrimination” and “Voter Fraud”. Implying, the leader of the free world does not know how to hold a Free Election?<br /><br />In many states, the Democratic Party is already hard at work in the courts fighting to remove Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader from ballets. The fear is, that voters may actually have a choice and vote for a third party candidate. <br /><br />It is apparent, through these court actions; Mr. Nader is “stealing” votes that rightfully belong to the Democratic Candidate. The Democratic Party, rightly so, are banking that without Nader on the ballet, Nader supporters will be left with no choice but to vote for John Kerry.<br /><br />In many key battle ground states, such as Florida, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and New Mexico, voter fraud is a hug concern in such a close election. There are ongoing questions being raised as to; multi-state residents voting twice, illegal immigrant votes, illegal felon votes, and questionable third party voter registration, just to mention a few. <br /><br />This might explain why the Democratic Party is so intent on defending “every vote” in these key battle ground states under the guise of voter discrimination, since many potential unwitting participants in fraud would be minority groups. <br /><br />This discussion is not designed to accuse the Democratic Party of anything. It is designed to engage every American and the Media in an open conversation about our freedoms and the consequence to America as a result of those in power who may abuse them. This discussion lays out three very important facts that are undeniable:<br /><br />1) The Democratic Party is making a concerted effort, using our courts, to silence the vote of Millions of Americans across this country.<br />2) The Democratic Party is prepared to file court action in Key States with the intent of challenging any election results, in which the Democratic Party feels voter disenfranchisement has occurred, and has cost them the election. <br />3) There are ongoing questionable and fraudulent voter registration and illegal votes taking place across the country and in Key battle ground states. <br /><br />Every American should be out raged that in our Democracy, one party, any party, would attempt to Silence the voice of its opposition. This is a dangerous road, and if rewarded, will encourage only further abuse of our rights and freedoms.<br /><br />The actions by the Democratic Party against the independent Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader reek of voter manipulation and these actions are contrary to our democratic principals and beliefs. They are nothing less than Un-American and full of treachery. <br /><br />Congress and the Senate must take action to protect future third party candidates and individuals from such litigious actions by another more powerful party. In America, we all deserve a voice, not just the voice that one party believes is right. <br /><br />It is the principal upon which our democracy is founded. It is time to put an end to exclusion in our political debate and open the door and make it easier for new and fresh voices to be heard. Is it any wonder nearly half of eligable Americans don’t vote? <br /><br />Every state has laws to protect against voter fraud. These laws are designed to protect those who follow the rules as laid out under each states statutes. Though these rules vary by state to a small degree, they are pretty consistent.<br /> <br />1) A voter must register to vote within the allotted time allowed by state law.<br />2) A voter must present valid identification, in the polling facility, proving they are whom they say.<br />3) A voter must vote in the precinct they are registered to vote in.<br />4) A voter, who requests and receives an absentee ballet and then chooses to vote in person, must bring the absentee ballet to the polling precinct with them in order to vote.<br />5) You may vote using the Absentee ballet. The ballet comes with complete instruction for properly casting your vote. If you do not mail your ballet in the time required, or you complete your ballet incorrectly, your vote will not be counted.<br />6) In almost all states, Felons may not participate in elections.<br />7) On the “honor System”, it is illegal to vote in two states. You may only vote in the state in which you maintain your primary residence.<br /><br />Pretty simple stuff, and each of these basic rules are in place to protect all participating voters from potential voter fraud. While the rules may prevent a few from voting, breaking these rules disenfranchises the millions of voters who followed them.<br /><br />However, every American must understand the easiest fraud can occur using absentee ballets. I sincerely hope that each state has adequate auditing functions in place to insure only legitimate votes are being counted. I believe this election; every absentee ballet should be fully audited prior to being counted. Especially with so many third parties now allowed to register voters and indeed, handle absentee ballets.<br /><br />From what I have read and heard in the media, many in the Democratic Party contend; if a voter shows up to vote and cannot provide proof of being a legally registered voter, that voter should still be allowed to vote; if a voter cannot present valid identification at the polling facility, that voter should still be allowed to vote; if a voter shows up at the wrong precinct, that voter should be allowed to cast a vote, regardless of the precinct requirement; if a voter requested an absentee ballet and fails to bring the ballet with them to the polling place, that they should still be allowed to vote; if a voter show up after the scheduled closing time for the polling place, that voter should still be allowed to vote.<br /><br />It gives me great concern that the preparation for lawsuits, months in advance, in order to challenge election results suggests complicity between the Democratic Party and unwitting participants in voter fraud. <br /><br />Again, given that most fraud will be committed using minority votes, it’s easy to stand up and say discrimination, that “vote” must be counted. This to is a dangerous road and risks disenfranchising millions of legitimate votes, cast by legitimate voters, who followed established laws, which protect their vote from potential voter fraud. With so many activists’ judges, many Americans now understand that just because a law exists, does not mean the law is enforced.<br /><br />Why would the Democratic Party take this position? They certainly can’t support the “count every vote” mantra given the legal action the party has taken in an attempt to disenfranchise millions of Nader Voters. <br /><br />Could it be, the Democratic Party is involved in a systematic attempt to commit the largest election fraud in American History? Could it be that Democratic Party, and its powerful members and allies, are so hungry for power that they would perpetrate such a fraud on the American People? Could it be, that the mainstream media, 80% of which are proven Democrats, are turning a blind eye to what may be taking place in the back rooms of our political parties?<br /><br />Three weeks before the most important election of our generation, the question begs to be asked is the Democratic Party attempting to silence the American Voter and steal an American election?<br /><br />Regardless of every Americans politics, Americans must look beyond what the politicians are saying and look to what the political parties and their surrogate groups are doing. <br /><br />We must ask ourselves, what do these potential and current court actions by the Democratic Party mean for the average voter in future elections? Who is involved in registering voters? Who is ordering absentee ballets vs the new voter registration pool established by these third parties? Who is handling or hand delivering absentee ballets to polling locations? We must ask questions and seek answers. <br /><br />How do we, as Americans, protect ourselves from powerful parties who control the very system we depend on for our freedoms? The very parties who control our courts, our laws, our rights and our very fundamental values?<br /><br />Every American should fear any party that would threaten or use a court to overturn an election result. <br />Every American should fear any party that would choose to manipulate an election through a selective vote count system. <br />Every American should fear any party that only believes the law applies when they are the beneficiaries of the law. <br />Every American should fear a party who would openly attempt to silence any one, much less attempt to silence a political voice. <br />Every American should fear a party that would use questionable tactics in an effort to manipulate an election. <br /><br />America, we should be very, very concerned.<br /><br />We need only look to our past and our founding fathers to see the danger they foresaw in a central government with excessive power controlled by those who would govern us.<br /><br />Article by: George Chaney<br />Please pass this onAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1097291888382934762004-10-08T21:18:00.000-06:002004-10-08T21:18:00.000-06:00Great list of talking points, I just loved it. But...Great list of talking points, I just loved it. But why no new posts? I was hoping to see some up to the second entries about the debate tonight! Oh well I guess, maybe later.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040880.post-1095723849348433632004-09-20T17:44:00.000-06:002004-09-20T17:44:00.000-06:00Ahhhh .. and so that justified the meanspirited an...Ahhhh .. and so that justified the meanspirited and vicious way in which the dad snatched the stickers out of the hands of the children? The fact that these children were upset to the point of tears .. that means nothing next to the fact that they (GASP!) had Bush Cheney stickers? If someone had given my boys Kerry/Edwards stickers... yes... I would have taken them at some point, but certainly not in the hatefilled manner I witnessed. ::: shrug ::: <br />Actually I'm getting used to the fact that the Kerry/Edwards supporters have no qualms with hatred and hurting others --- the ends justifying the hurtfull and hatefilled means. I see it in every parade and political function I've attended.Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02479997164145846530noreply@blogger.com